Title

SRFI 16: Syntax for procedures of variable arity

Author

Lars T Hansen

Status

This SRFI is currently in ``final'' status. To see an explanation of each status that a SRFI can hold, see here. You can access the discussion via the archive of the mailing list.

Abstract

CASE-LAMBDA, a syntax for procedures with a variable number of arguments, is introduced.

Rationale

CASE-LAMBDA reduces the clutter of procedures that execute different code depending on the number of arguments they were passed; it is a pattern-matching mechanism that matches on the number of arguments. CASE-LAMBDA is available in some Scheme systems.

While CASE-LAMBDA can be implemented as a macro using only facilities available in R5RS Scheme, it admits considerable implementation-specific optimization.

Specification

(CASE-LAMBDA <clause> ...)
Syntax

Each <clause> should have the form (<formals> <body>), where <formals> is a formal arguments list as for LAMBDA, cf section 4.1.4 of the R5RS. Each <body> is a <tail-body>, cf section 3.5 of the R5RS.

A CASE-LAMBDA expression evaluates to a procedure that accepts a variable number of arguments and is lexically scoped in the same manner as procedures resulting from LAMBDA expressions. When the procedure is called with some arguments V1 .. Vk, then the first <clause> for which the arguments agree with <formals> is selected, where agreement is specified as for the <formals> of a LAMBDA expression. The variables of <formals> are bound to fresh locations, the values V1 .. Vk are stored in those locations, the <body> is evaluated in the extended environment, and the results of <body> are returned as the results of the procedure call.

It is an error for the arguments not to agree with the <formals> of any <clause>.

             (define plus
               (case-lambda 
                 (() 0)
                 ((x) x)
                 ((x y) (+ x y))
                 ((x y z) (+ (+ x y) z))
                 (args (apply + args))))

             (plus)                     --> 0
             (plus 1)                   --> 1
             (plus 1 2 3)               --> 6

             ((case-lambda 
               ((a) a)
               ((a b) (* a b)))
              1 2 3)                    --> error

Implementation

The following implementation is written in R5RS Scheme. It is not compatible with the IEEE Scheme standard because the IEEE standard does not contain the high-level macro system.

The implementation assumes that some top-level names defined by the R5RS are bound to their original values.

(define-syntax case-lambda
  (syntax-rules ()
    ((case-lambda 
      (?a1 ?e1 ...) 
      ?clause1 ...)
     (lambda args
       (let ((l (length args)))
         (case-lambda "CLAUSE" args l 
           (?a1 ?e1 ...)
           ?clause1 ...))))
    ((case-lambda "CLAUSE" ?args ?l 
      ((?a1 ...) ?e1 ...) 
      ?clause1 ...)
     (if (= ?l (length '(?a1 ...)))
         (apply (lambda (?a1 ...) ?e1 ...) ?args)
         (case-lambda "CLAUSE" ?args ?l 
           ?clause1 ...)))
    ((case-lambda "CLAUSE" ?args ?l
      ((?a1 . ?ar) ?e1 ...) 
      ?clause1 ...)
     (case-lambda "IMPROPER" ?args ?l 1 (?a1 . ?ar) (?ar ?e1 ...) 
       ?clause1 ...))
    ((case-lambda "CLAUSE" ?args ?l 
      (?a1 ?e1 ...)
      ?clause1 ...)
     (let ((?a1 ?args))
       ?e1 ...))
    ((case-lambda "CLAUSE" ?args ?l)
     (error "Wrong number of arguments to CASE-LAMBDA."))
    ((case-lambda "IMPROPER" ?args ?l ?k ?al ((?a1 . ?ar) ?e1 ...)
      ?clause1 ...)
     (case-lambda "IMPROPER" ?args ?l (+ ?k 1) ?al (?ar ?e1 ...) 
      ?clause1 ...))
    ((case-lambda "IMPROPER" ?args ?l ?k ?al (?ar ?e1 ...) 
      ?clause1 ...)
     (if (>= ?l ?k)
         (apply (lambda ?al ?e1 ...) ?args)
         (case-lambda "CLAUSE" ?args ?l 
           ?clause1 ...)))))

Copyright

Copyright (C) Lars T Hansen (1999). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Scheme Request For Implementation process or editors, except as needed for the purpose of developing SRFIs in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the SRFI process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the authors or their successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE AUTHOR AND THE SRFI EDITORS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Editor: Mike Sperber
Last modified: Thu Aug 14 16:53:15 CDT 2003